<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: HTML 4.01 or xHTML 1?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuzzylizard.com/archives/2009/04/29/1053/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuzzylizard.com/archives/2009/04/29/1053/</link>
	<description>Web development and design with a little VFX thrown in for fun</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2011 22:45:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morgan Roderick</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzylizard.com/archives/2009/04/29/1053/comment-page-1/#comment-34404</link>
		<dc:creator>Morgan Roderick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzylizard.com/?p=1053#comment-34404</guid>
		<description>The stricter the better!

If it was practical, I&#039;d love to use a proper mimetype when serving XHTML documents.

One thing that comes to mind, which Dave doesn&#039;t mention is the fact that XHTML 1.0 Strict has been cleaned of a lot of the presentational elements that plagued us in the past. I wouldn&#039;t want to go back to presentational markup again.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The stricter the better!</p>
<p>If it was practical, I&#8217;d love to use a proper mimetype when serving XHTML documents.</p>
<p>One thing that comes to mind, which Dave doesn&#8217;t mention is the fact that XHTML 1.0 Strict has been cleaned of a lot of the presentational elements that plagued us in the past. I wouldn&#8217;t want to go back to presentational markup again.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

