<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lessons Learned: Why Unit tests just won&#8217;t cut it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.fuzzylizard.com/archives/2008/07/17/955/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.fuzzylizard.com/archives/2008/07/17/955/</link>
	<description>My thoughts on Agile, Java and Ruby on Rails (mostly)</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 20:43:13 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnston</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzylizard.com/archives/2008/07/17/955/comment-page-1/#comment-26975</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Johnston</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 06:03:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzylizard.com/?p=955#comment-26975</guid>
		<description>I agree. This is a perfect example of where pairing would have helped. Two heads instead of one would have thought of doing an integration test much earlier.

In the end, I used a straight forward implementation of the strategy pattern and everything worked out. And this second time around, I started with an integration test, got that working and worked my way from there.

It was a good learning opportunity though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. This is a perfect example of where pairing would have helped. Two heads instead of one would have thought of doing an integration test much earlier.</p>
<p>In the end, I used a straight forward implementation of the strategy pattern and everything worked out. And this second time around, I started with an integration test, got that working and worked my way from there.</p>
<p>It was a good learning opportunity though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rahul</title>
		<link>http://www.fuzzylizard.com/archives/2008/07/17/955/comment-page-1/#comment-26973</link>
		<dc:creator>Rahul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 02:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.fuzzylizard.com/?p=955#comment-26973</guid>
		<description>Obviously. What were you thinking ?

In our zest to fine tune unit testing (mocks and all) , we often forget that there is only so much that unit testing can achieve. 

Where I work, most of the work is highly database intensive. Database and its wrappers (ORM tools etc.) introduce their own level of complexity and we try to test them as early as possible in the development cycle.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obviously. What were you thinking ?</p>
<p>In our zest to fine tune unit testing (mocks and all) , we often forget that there is only so much that unit testing can achieve. </p>
<p>Where I work, most of the work is highly database intensive. Database and its wrappers (ORM tools etc.) introduce their own level of complexity and we try to test them as early as possible in the development cycle.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
