Actually, this is not about SCO, it is just about one idiot who has decided to stand up in support of SCO. This person would be none other then Rob Enderle. Personally, I never really realized that people this completely clueless actually existed on the planet. Apparently they do.To be honest, until last wednesday, I had never heard of him. This changed when I listened to the Linux Show and his name came up in during the show. More precisely, what was mentioned was an open letter that Joe Barr wrote to Rob Enderle in response to the keynote address he gave at the SCO Forum. In this keynote address, Rob attacks Gkroklaw and almost all Linux users alike. The main point of his address, aside from repeatedly mentioning how many threats he has received for supporting SCO, was that if companies decide to use Linux and free software it will eventually result in the total destruction of the American economy.
Personally, I think Rob must suffer from some sort of paranoia complex as he continuely focuses on how many threats, and death threats, he has received since standing up to support SCO.
To say that Rob just doesn’t get it when it comes to open source software like saying that the sun is yellow or water is wet. All you need to do is read his keynote address and the inconsistencies become glaringly obvious. However, I am not going to offer up a review or analysis of his address as one has already been done. In this analysis, the author, point by point, shows the logical flaws that are all to pervasive through out the entire address. In fact, Rob’s strongest point is based on theory called the Broken Window fallacy:
Since Mr. Enderle mentions Economics, now would be a good time to mention the Broken Window fallacy that he implicitly uses. The Broken Window fallacy states that it is good for the economy when a kid hits a baseball through a window, as that homeowner spends money to replace the window. The fallacy exists because that scenario assumes that the money the homeowner would have spent on the replacement window would not otherwise have been spent. (Perhaps the homeowner would have set fire to a small stack of twenty dollar bills instead.)
Even if (and that’s a significant “if”) Linux and Free Software were indeed always free as in gratis, tax revenues would not necessary decline. The money normally spent on software licenses would not instead be burned during a Board of Directors meeting. Rather, that money would be spent on software services, or more hardware, or perhaps distributed as cash (or equivalent) to employees and / or owners. The end result is that the money would be spent, just not on software licenses. (Neil, 2004, pg 2)
The thing that blows my mind is that these people exist at all. I don’t understand. If I have a business (or a non-profit, or a government) and I need to install software onto my computers I have two choices: (1) I can either spend thousands of dollars on proprietary software or (2) I can download OpenOffice.org and install that for free. Rob Enderle would have me waste the money — cause if I don’t spend the money then the government is going to crumble.
AAAaaahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh!!!!! I think that just about sums it up for me. I think there are people out there who simply can not handle the idea of free. They can not handle the idea that people would be willing to make available the source code to something that they spend time creating. The whole idea of patents and copyright and capitalism and money is so entrenched in these people that the idea of making something available freely is completely beyond their comprehension.
Anyway, I am not sure if this post makes any sense and I am not sure if I am going to take the time to make it make sense, so you will have to forgive me for rambling, but definitely have a read through some of the links and make up your own mind on this topic.
References
Wehneman, Neil. Misc. Writing - Logical Critique of Rob Enderle’s “Free Software and the Idiots Who Buy It”, Aug 11, 2004, http://fallinggrace.com/article.php?story=20040811015739829